Tag Archives: teacher training

+ Professional Development: Children of the Code Offers 4-Disc Series

other topics: use search box

From the beginning of the Children of the Code Project, the premise has been that if educators and parents understand the challenges involved in learning to read, they are much better equipped to help their students.

Teaching the Teachers

Based on this premise, their 4-disc series is designed to support educators who can be involved in teaching other educators, literacy volunteers, policy makers and members of the general public.  The content involves “what’s at stake,” and “what’s involved” in learning to read.

This series is not a “how to teach reading” course.  

It’s a collection of video segments and animations designed to help professional adults and parents develop a deeper  first-person understanding of the issues involved.

The Children of the Code Project is offering a one-time 20 percent discount off the regular price on the first 400 DVD four-disc sets.

 Visit  http://www.childrenofthecode.org/DVD/PD-V1_special_offer.htm.  The offer will expire May 3, 2011. 

Included in the package:

  • 103 Video Segments
  • Upgraded versions of all 64 main videos on the ChildrenOfTheCode.org web site
  • Two new chapters:  “The Brain’s Challenge” and “Changing Trajectories”
  • 39 new videos not on the web site
  • Content that is formatted for DVD and optimized for large screen displays
  • Menus and titling conventions that allow for easy navigation
  •  Visual metaphors that aid in understanding

The Children of the Code Project is looking forward to hearing how this new 4-disc DVD set assists educators in their efforts.  They are a non-profit organization.

The DVD set is $67.00.  It appears that the first 400 orders by May 3rd will receive a 20% discount.

  • Disc 1 – “What’s at Stake,” “What is Reading?” ,”Unnatural   Confusion,” and About the COTC  DVD Series”
  • Disc 2 — “So Let it Be Written,” “The First Millennium Bug,” “Paradigm Inertia”
  • Disc 3 — “Causes and Contributing Factors,” “Readiness,” “Shame”
  • Disc 4 –“The Brain’s Challenge,” “Changing Trajectories”

tutoring in Columbus OH:   Adrienne Edwards  614-579-6021  or email aedwardstutor@columbus.rr.com.

+ November 2010 — Lindamood-Bell Workshops in Cincinnati

 other topics: click a “category” or use search box

Lindamood Bell Learning Processes is bringing five of its teacher-training workshops to the Cincinnati area November 8-18, 2010.

Teachers, parents and educators will have the opportunity to attend the workshops at the Holiday Inn Concinnati Airport in Erlanger Kentucky.

  • Attend the two- day “Seeing Stars” seminar November 8-9.
  • Visualizing and Verbalizing” is a two-day workshop as well: November 10 -11.
  • “Talkies”  is a one-day workshop on November 12.
  • The LiPS (Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing) workshop is a three-day workshop November 15-17.
  • “On Cloud Nine Math” (OCN) is a one-day workshop on November 18.

Call 800-233-1819.  Register for the workshops at  http://www.lindamoodbell.com/registration.Aspx

tutoring in Columbus OH:  Adrienne Edwards   614-579-6021  or email  aedwardstutor@columbus.rr.com  

+ Ohio State Will Train Columbus Science and Math Teachers

other topics: click a “category” or use search box

Ohio State University and three other Ohio colleges are part of an expansion of the Woodrow Wilson Teaching Fellowship.

OSU will prepare math and science teachers to work in local low-income schools, according to Encarnacion Pyle’s article in the Columbus Dispatch.

Columbus schools Supeintendent Gene Harris says

What’s unique about this program is that it is focused on the urban schools, which will give us an opportunity to make sure our high-poverty students, those with limited English skills and the like get an equal footing in science and math [with] other students.

Launched in 2007 in Indiana, The Woodrow Wilson Fellowship is intended to develop a model for states to revamp their teacher training programs, as well as to address a shortage of teachers who have a depth of  knowledge in math, science and technology.

In addition to the four universities in Ohio (OSU, and John Carroll in Cleveland, Akron and Cincinnati), four universities in Michigan will participate.

Announcing the expansion of the program, President Obama said in a written statement, “America’s leadership tomorrow depends on how we educate our students today, especially in science, math and engineering.”  

The president says he expects the new partnership to help move American students from the middle of the pack to the top in science and math achievement over the next decade.

The fellowships are funded with support from both private and state sources.  They provide $30,000 stipends to prospective teachers who agree to a year of intensive training. 

In return, recipients promise to teach in their local school systems for three years. 

The colleges also receive monies to use for rethinking their approach to teacher preparation.

The Ohio colleges hope to train 80 math and science teachers in the first year.  Overall, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio will share nearly $40 million in public and private money, and prepare more than 700 teachers.

The Ohio program will be paid through six foundations and the state’s “Choose Ohio First” scholarship program, which is aimed at recruiting more students in science, technology, engineering, math and medicine (STEM).

Arthur Levine, the president of the Woodrow Wilson Foundation, says the foundation is focused on acute shortages among these types of teachers, as well as the high attrition rate since the end of WW II.

The Woodrow Wilson STEM Teaching Fellowship works at the state level because, state by staate, small numbers of teachers make big differences.

 sole source: Encarnacion Pyle’s article in the Columbus Dispatch on 3/2/10.  http://www.dispatch.com

tutoring in Columbus OH:   Adrienne Edwards   614-579-6021  or email aedwardstutor@columbus.rr.com. .

+ Singapore Math: Intensive Teacher Trainings

other topics: click a “category” or use search box

Intensive Five-day Summer Institutes in teaching “Singapore Math” are scheduled in Orlando (June 23-27), San Francisco (July 14-18), and Boston (July 28-August 1). 

These three will focus on the fundamentals, and are geared to teachers of grades 1-6 who have little or no experience in Singapore Math, “especially those who intend to supplement a non-Singapore Math program or adopt a Singapore Math program.”

A fourth Institute titled “Advanced” will be held in Boston from August 4-8.  The advanced seminar will be directed at grade 1-6 educators with in-depth training experience in teaching Singapore Math who are either supplementing their current program or adopting the Singapore Math curriculum.

Call toll free 1-800-462-1478 or www.SDE.com/revolutionary.

Conference registration is $1395.  It includes a tool kit containing $500 worth of customizable materials: Singapore Math for US Handout Book; an 8-step Model Drawing Book;  the Teaching Elementary Mathematics book; a voucher to redeem one “sample set” from the Primary Mathematics book series (includes one copy of both A & B versions of a Teacher’s guide, student textbook and student workbook — your choice of grade level).

Trainees receive 26.5 total contact hours plus 2 additional hours upon completion of the on-demand electronic follow-up training.  For futher information about graduate credit through Antioch University Seattle and Chapman University College, visit www.SDE.com/revolutionary and follow the “credit” link.

WHAT IS “SINGAPORE MATH?” 

When the US Department of Education commissioned a study in 2005 to find out why Singapore, a country with a population half the size of New York City, ALWAYS scores No. 1 in a widely accepted comparison of global math skills, it concluded, “Singapore’s textbooks build deep understanding of mathematical concepts through multi-step problems and concrete illustrations that demonstrate how abstract mathematical concepts are used to solve problems from different perspectives.”

By contrast, the study said, “traditional US textbooks rarely get beyond definitions and formulas, developing only students’ mechanical ability to apply mathematical concepts.”

Many eminent mathematicians agree.  In fact, according to an LA Times article on March 9 2008, it is hard to find a mathematician who likes the standard American texts, or dislikes Singapore’s.

An article by Barry Garelick from Stanford’s Hoover Institution shows a US textbook side by side with the Singapore Math book.  “Singapore Math’s textbook is thin, and contains only mathematics — no games.  Students are given brief explanations, then confronted with problems which become more complex as the unit progresses.”

By contrast, the US text, “typical of many math textbooks in the US is thick, multicolored, and full of games, puzzles and activities to help teachers pass the time” but which rarely challenge students.

Singapore’s text contains no graphics other than occasional cartoons pertaining to the lesson at hand, no spreadsheet problems, and no problems asking students to use a calculator to find the “mean number of dogs in a US household”.

With SM, students are required to show their mathematical work, not explain in essays how they did the problems or how they felt about them.

According to the Hopkins article, “While a single lesson in a US textbook might span two pages and take one class period to go through, a lesson in a Singapore textbook might use five to ten pages and take several days to complete.  The Singapore texts contain no narrative explanation of how a procedure or concept works; instead there are problems and questions accompanied by pictures that provide hints about what is going on.  According to the AIR (American Institutes for Research, a government group) report, the Singapore program ‘provides rich problem sets that give students many and varied opportunities to apply the concepts they have learned.’ “

Another key difference: the number of topics covered for a single grade: the AIR study frequently criticizes American math texts for being an inch deep and a mile wide, covering a great range of topics with little time spent on developing the material, including mastery of math facts.

The Singapore texts also present material in a logical sequence throughout the grades, and expect mastery of the material before the move to the next level.  “In contrast,” writes Garelick in the Hoover article, “mainstream American math texts and curricula frequently rely on a ‘spiral’ approach, in which topics are revisited and reviewed.  The expectation is that not all students achieve mastery the first time around.”

An Ohio schoolteacher summed up the “spiral” approach on an Internet math forum by writing that students “can’t remember how to do it when they do return — or if they do remember it, it’s now being taught in a different way.”

But the most important feature of Singapore’s texts, according to Garelick, is an ingenious problem-solving strategy built into the curriculum.  Word problems are for most students the most difficult part of any mathematics course.

Singapore’s texts help solve the problem.  A key step in problem-solving is model-drawing.

Typically, in US texts, students are taught to use a method called “Guess and Check” — trying combinations of numbers until the right numbers are found that satify the conditions of the problem (a method that many mathematicians consider inefficient). 

The Singapore bar-modelling technique not only provides a powerful method for solving problems, but also serves as a link to algebra.  Symbolic representation of problems, the mainstay of algebra, emerges as a logical extension of the bar-modeling technique.

On Your Mark — Get Set — Think!

The LA Times article describes the classroom of Arpie Liparian, a first grade teacher.  She stands in front of her class with a stopwatch.  The only sound is of pencils scratching paper, as the students race through the daily “sprint,” a 60-second drill that is a key part of the Singpore system.  The idea, once commonplace in math classrooms, is to practice problems until they become second nature.

Critics call this “drill and kill,” but one math coach calls it “drill and thrill.”  Liparian’s students don’t all finish all the problems in 60 seconds; only one girl gets all the answers right.  But they are all bubbling with excitement, and Liparian praises every effort.  “Give yourselve a hand, boys and girls,” she says when all the drills have been corrected.  “You did a wonderful job.”

That math coach, Robin Ramos, says that what isn’t obvious to the casual observer is that this drill is carefully thought out to reinforce patterns of mathematical thinking that carry through the curriculum.

“These are ‘procedures with connections,’ “  Ramos says, arranged to convey sometimes subtle points.  This thoughfulness — some say brilliance — is the true hallmark of the Singapore books, according to advocates.

Yoram Sagher, a math professor at the University of Illinois, says that after 10 years of studying the Singapore curriculum, he still has “very pleasant surprises and realizations” while reading the books.  He is constantly amazed, he says, by the “gentle, clever ways that the mathematics is brought to the intuition of the students.”

It is true that the Singapore texts are not as teacher friendly as most American texts.  “They don’t come with teahers’ editions, or two-page foldouts with comments, or step-by-step instructions about how to give the lessons.  And in our math-phobic society, many teachers lack a strong math foundation to begin with.

Key to implementing the Singapore Math curriculum –  and achieving the spectacular results seen in a few select schools — will be intensive training of teachers.

sources: Barry Garelick’s Hoover Institution journal article  on “Miracle Math”from fall 2006; also Mitchell Landsberg’s article in the LA times on 3/9/08 (www.latimes.com ); and SDE flyers promoting the Singapore Math Intensive Institutes.  

+ Eastern Michigan U: New Master’s Program in Autism

other topics: click a “category” or use search box

Eastern Michigan University (www.emich.edu) is starting a new master’s degree program to train special education teachers to meet the needs of the growing number of children with autism.

Approved by the EMU Board of Regents in January, 2008, the first 20 graduates will enroll in the master of arts degree program in autism spectrum disorders in the 2008-09 academic year.  Within three years, enrollment is planned to grow to 60 students.

EMU officials say the new master’s degree fills a pressing need.  The number of children diagnosed with autism disorders has increased, and the state of Michigan lacks enough special education personnel who are prepared to teach them.

source: mlive.com on 1/27/08

tutoring in Columbus OH:   Adrienne Edwards   614-579-6021   or email  aedwardstutor@columbus.rr.com  

+ Orton-Gillingham Trainings at Kildonan School in 2008

other topics: click a “category” or use search box

The Kildonan School, in Amenia NY,  offers accredited training programs leading to certification by the Academy of Orton-Gillingham Practitioners and Educators (AOGPE).

Associate Level Training will be held on July 7-13 and July 13-17 (70 hours.)  Classes are from 8:30 am to 4:30 pm.  This includes 10 additional hours of training (beyond the required 60 hour course) toward the Associate Level.

Space is limited to twenty participants.  Cost for the full two weeks is $1500, including breakfast, lunch and all materials.  There is a list of local Inns and B&B’s if accommodations are required.

Subsequent practicum, according to Academy standards for application as an Associate member, can be developed at participant’s request at an added cost.  Contact KTTI Director Karen Leopold at kleopold@kildonan.org  or phone 845-373-2021 for an application and additional information.  Web site is www.kildonan.org.

Certified Level Training will be held in two parts: 

  • Part I on August 11-16, 2008 (50 hours), and  
  • Part II in August 2009 (50 hours).

Course I or II can be taken in any order; together they make up the required AOGPE 100 hour Certified level coursework.  The cost for each part is $1100.  Housing is available for $250.

Prerequisite course requirements can be found at the Kildonan Web site (see above.)  Subsequent practicum, in keeping with the Academy’s standards for application as a Certified member, can be developed at participants request at an added cost.  See information above for contacting KTTI Director Karen Leopold.

Trainers include Diana Hanbury King, Theresa Collins, Dawn Nieman, and Karen K. Leopold.  All are Fellows in the Academy; Diana King is a founding Fellow.  All teach at Kildonan.

The Kildonan School was founded in 1969 by Diana Hanbury King to serve the needs of dyslexic students of average to above average intelligence.  The objective of the school is to empower students to reach their potential and to equip them for future success through an intensive program of one-to-one training in reading, writing and spelling.

Camp Dunnabeck, the oldest residential camp of its kind, was established in 1955 by Diana Hanbury King to support intelligent children who are having difficulty in their academic work because of dyslexia or language-based learning disabilities.

The Orton-Gillingham Approach is used throughout both these programs.

tutoring in Columbus OH:   Adrienne Edwards   614-579-6021   or email  aedwardstutor@columbus.rr.com

+ Science and Math Teachers — Great Opportunity

other topics: click a “category” or use search box

An article by Sean Cavanagh from Education Week 11/28/07:  

 Imagine a classroom filled with thousands of feet of cable and a pair of microscopes four stories high. Students work alongside top-tier scientists, who use the surrounding instruments to probe nuclear matter in the hope of one day producing breakthroughs in science and technology.  

The classroom in this case is known as Hall A, located in the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. And the students are science teachers, who come to the federal laboratory in Newport News, Va., as part of an unusual professional-development opportunity.  

The Academies Creating Teacher Scientists program pairs top federal scientists from the U.S. Department of Energy with middle and high school teachers from around the country who want to improve their classroom skills.  

Teachers spend four to eight weeks for three consecutive summers under the tutelage of scientists at federal labs of their choice, crafting activities and lessons they can use in their classrooms.  

The program is just one of many sponsored by federal agencies that offer training to mathematics and science teachers. Although some officials question the effectiveness of those efforts, they have proved popular with teachers seeking help beyond what they can find on the more traditional circuit of educator workshops and conferences.  \

One first-year participant in the Energy Department’s program this past summer was Joseph J. Amma, an 8th grade teacher from North East Middle School, in Maryland, about 50 miles from Baltimore. Mr. Amma was one of 17 science teachers who were introduced to scientific equipment and resources at the lab, then worked together with help from federal scientists to design simple in-class activities and experiments based on the science they saw there.  

“We didn’t have someone just talking at us,” Mr. Amma said. “We were physically engaged, rather than someone just coming in and giving us a lecture.” The scientists at the lab, he said, showed the teachers “very simple concepts, taken to a very advanced level.”  

A Confidence Game

About 200 teachers have taken part so far in the academies program, which was launched in 2004 and has a $2.3 million annual budget. Educators apply online to work at any of 12 Energy Department labs across the country with researchers who specialize in a variety of fields, not just energy.  

Participating teachers work with mentor-scientists, who guide them through research projects and provide them with seminars and demonstrations related to the lab’s work. Teachers also draw up online professional-development plans describing how they will continue to improve their teaching skills, and they write curricula based on lab experiences. They are encouraged to stay in touch with the lab scientists during the school year.  

Teachers receive stipends of $800 a week during the program, and can apply for grants of up to $4,000 per year to buy lab equipment for their classes and to pursue other professional development. Depending on how far their homes are from the federal energy facilities, they can live in housing at the labs. Mr. Amma, whose school is located in North East, Md., and another teacher from there, Jennifer L. Everett—who also happens to be his fiancée—took that option, bunking in the same facility as visiting scientists and students who come from around the world to work at the Jefferson accelerator facility.  

A typical day, Ms. Everett said, began with a lecture from a lab scientist, followed by a presentation or tour of one part of the facility. Afternoons were spent on group activities focused on improving classroom skills. Teachers also built equipment for their classes from scratch, based on the science under discussion. They were expected to reflect on their observations in online journals.  

The goal, as with many professional-development programs, is to produce teachers skilled and confident enough to act as leaders who can help their colleagues when they return to their home districts, said Jan Tyler, the science education manager at the Jefferson lab.  

Building that confidence takes time. It’s easy for teachers to feel intimidated by their mentors, who have vast scientific knowledge and lengthy professional credentials, Ms. Tyler noted. The Jefferson lab, which has a total staff of about 700 employees, conducts cutting-edge research on nuclear physics, with a focus on the nucleus of the atom.  

“The teachers feel like they’re not as important as the scientists are. That’s something we’re trying to fix,” Ms. Tyler said. “They need to hear that they’re very important to the future of this country. They don’t hear that enough.”  

Douglas W. Higinbotham, a staff scientist has worked with teachers in the program, appreciates the role educators play. He remembers how two of his high school teachers—in junior-year chemistry and senior-year physics—helped set him on his professional path.  

“They were not big on memorization—they were big on concepts,” he said. “That really got me hooked.”  

Mr. Higinbotham, a nuclear physicist, tries to follow a similar philosophy in working with teachers. He introduces them to various concepts and discusses how lab instruments are used, such as the massive microscopes in Hall A known as spectrometers.  

One of his recent projects centered on cosmic rays—particles that flood Earth from beyond its atmosphere, though they cannot be seen or felt. He had teachers research the topic on their own, and, over the course of several weeks, introduced them to the techniques scientists use to detect the rays. He wants teachers not only to understand the concept, but also how scientists study phenomena that are not readily detectable.  

Along with the Department of Energy, federal agencies overseeing training programs for math and science teachers include the U.S. Department of Education, the National Science Foundation, and the National Aeronautic and Space Administration.  

NASA has long been involved in K-12 education. The agency stages institutes for 300 to 500 teachers preparing to enter classrooms and offers programs that serve about 1,000 current science and mathematics educators a year, said Jim Stofan, a deputy assistant administrator for the space agency.  

Addressing Weaknesses

Those federal programs have come under increasing pressure to show results, however. A report released in May questioned the effectiveness of 105 math and science programs with combined budgets of $3 billion scattered across agencies, including those focused on teachers. Congress mandated the report, which was released by the Academic Competitiveness Council, a federal panel chaired by U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings.  

The Energy Department has established a process for evaluating the academies that is consistent with the council’s report and will take effect in fiscal 2008, said Bill Valdez, the agency’s associate director of workforce development for teachers and scientists.  

But he also noted that department officials initially designed the academies based on what he regards as research-proven strategies—namely, giving teachers sustained support, rather than one-time help, and connecting them with mentor scientists and exceptional teachers. “We were pretty confident going into the program that it would be successful,” Mr. Valdez said in an e-mail.  

For Mr. Amma and Ms. Everett, the Maryland teachers, the chance to study at a federal lab, and bring that experience back to their classrooms, was too good to pass up.  

Among the most productive activities, Ms. Everett said, were sessions in which she and other teachers were asked to examine their strengths and weaknesses in the classroom—and come up with activities to help them address their shortcomings. She wanted ideas about devising activities that could be used with both high- and low-performing science students. Over the summer, with help from other teachers and the lab’s staff members, Ms. Everett conceived projects that focused on eddy currents and electrical fields, which she will use with both groups.  

Lab officials broadened teachers’ knowledge of science by asking them to build various devices from scratch. Ms. Everett and Mr. Amma were both asked to construct a “ring fling,” a small, pole-like object made of wire, pipe, and other materials, which the teachers plan to use this school year in their lessons on electricity and magnetism.  

Mr. Amma has produced a slide show of his experiences at the lab, which demonstrates various high-tech equipment at work. It’s been a hit, so he’s trying to space the show out over the semester to keep students hooked.  

“I thought they would get sick of them, but the kids keep wanting [more],” said Mr. Amma, who remarks that his own enthusiasm has been rekindled. “When you come back, you have genuine excitement for science,” he said. “It changes you in what you see scientifically.”    

EXPERT TUTORS

Teachers accepted to the Academies Creating Teacher Scientists program spend four to eight weeks picking up classroom ideas and skills from scientists.  Program features: 

  • SIZE:About 200 teachers have participated so far. 
  • SUPPORT:In addition to on-site training, teachers receive stipends and can apply for grant funding for classroom materials, further training, and travel. 
  • LOCATIONS: (Department of Energy section) 12 U.S. Department of Energy labs train teachers through the program:• Ames National Laboratory (Iowa)• Argonne National Laboratory (Ill.)• Brookhaven National Laboratory (N.Y.)• Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Ill.)• Idaho National Laboratory (Idaho)• Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Calif.)• Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Calif.)• National Renewable Energy Laboratory (Colo.)• Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Tenn.)• Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (Wash.)• Sandia National Laboratories (N.M.)• Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Va.)  

source: Education Week; www.edweek.org .  Article by Sean Cavanaugh on 11/28/07 

tutoring in Columbus OH:   Adrienne Edwards   614-579-6021   or email  aedwardstutor@columbus.rr.com